Sheep scab is estimated to cost the UK sheep sector £78-202 million annually.

A disease which was historically under control, and even eradicated at one time, has now re-established, and increased exponentially with resultant economic and welfare impacts.

Sheep scab disease is caused by the Psoroptes ovis mite which can be transmitted between animals and via the environment on fomites e.g. clothing, equipment which carry infection.

Coupled with its ability to survive for up to 17 days in the environment, for example on wool caught in fences, this makes control challenging.

The mite feeds on debris at the skin surface producing faeces which elicit a severe allergic reaction on the sheep host, causing skin lesions and intense itching.

While many are familiar with the classic signs of severe ‘scabby lesions’, nibbling and scratching due to intense itching, fewer are familiar with the signs of chronic sheep scab disease, and unaware that long-term infections may cause no obvious clinical signs at all.

This is particularly critical to consider when introducing new animals into the flock. Animals which have been repeatedly exposed to sheep scab disease are likely to have developed an immune response.

This immunity will not eradicate disease, and will not prevent transmission between animals, but will dampen or even prevent obvious clinical signs.

All new incoming stock should be considered at risk of carrying scab and we now have a new diagnostic test to determine risk status.

Skin scraping has been widely used for diagnosis and offers a quick, cost-effective solution. Your veterinary surgeon can carry out a skin scrape, and deliver results rapidly, facilitating ongoing management.

Even where infestation is present, mites may not be detected on skin scrapes, particularly if low mite numbers are present. Moredun have developed a sheep scab (blood) Elisa test which is available commercially via Biobest Laboratories and Wales Veterinary Science Centre.

Infested animals produce antibodies and this test can detect those antibodies. A positive result informs us that the animal has been exposed but interpretation is important as animals which have been successfully treated recently may still be positive.

A negative result tells us that exposure is unlikely. Your vet will be able to advise on the results obtained.

The greatest benefit comes from using the test on a flock level basis (screening 12 animals per management group).

If sheep scab is diagnosed, engage with your vet or RAMA (SQP) to discuss treatment options.

There are currently two treatment groups available- plunge dipping with organophosphate dip or injecting with Macrocyclic Lactones (group 3 clear wormers).

When determining which approach to take, consider and discuss the following with the prescriber:

• How will different treatments impact my roundworm control plan?

• Is clean housing/pasture available or is a product which prevents reinfection required?

• What is the administration protocol and can it be facilitated?

• How will the withdrawal impact management e.g. drawing lambs

• For dipping, is there an ‘Award in the Safe Use of Sheep Dip’ held and responsible disposal method in place (according to the local environmental agency). If not, could a mobile dipping contractor be utilised?

• How has scab likely to have been introduced and who do we need to inform that may also be affected e.g. neighbours?

Due to the different protocols (one injection vs two), different routes of administration (subcutaneous vs intramuscular) and prevention vs treatment-only products, it is easy to make mistakes which can result in treatment failure.

Double check before administering that they are being used correctly.

Diazinon has been used in showers/jetters however the product is not licensed for this use and there are numerous concerns including:

• Ability of mites to survive in ear canals facilitating reinfection

• Dip concentration in fleeces following showering has been demonstrated as significantly lower in trial work vs plunge dipping which could result in treatment failure and a reduced duration of protection.

• Exposure of mites to sub-lethal concentrations may lead to resistance.

• Harmful aerosol generated may increase risk of inhalation

• Medicines must only be used in accordance with their licensed use

The first evidence of sheep scab mite resistance to injectable treatments was confirmed in 2018, although the extent of this issue is not known. The good news is that sheep scab mites which are resistant to injectable treatments have been demonstrated as susceptible to plunge dipping with diazinon. This allows us to eliminate the resistant sheep scab mites from the flock entirely.

ML treatments are also used to target gastrointestinal roundworms. Using injectables to target scab, when there is a low worm burden which does not require treatment, may also speed up the development of roundworm resistance.

With this in mind, when determining which product to utilise, consideration should be given to how this will impact the roundworm population. If the roundworm burden is low, and does not require treatment, consider utilising plunge dipping which only targets external parasites.

If you utilise any product for treatment, and clinical signs persist more than two weeks after treatment, report the issue to the prescriber and manufacturer for guidance. Do not administer an additional treatment without seeking guidance.

To date, no resistance of the scab mite to diazinon has been confirmed in the UK although it has been identified elsewhere globally which is why we must use scab control products responsibly to reduce the rate of development of resistance.

Numerous control schemes to tackle scab and are being rolled out across the UK. For up-to-date information on management of sheep scab disease, consult the Sustainable Control of Worms in Sheep (SCOPS) website.

We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.

Please report any comments that break our rules.

This website and associated newspapers adhere to the Independent Press Standards Organisation's Editors' Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about the editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then please contact the editor here. If you are dissatisfied with the response provided you can contact IPSO here

© 2001-2022. This site is part of Newsquest's audited local newspaper network. A Gannett Company. Newsquest Media Group Ltd, Loudwater Mill, Station Road, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire. HP10 9TY. Registered in England & Wales | 01676637 |

Data returned from the Piano 'meterActive/meterExpired' callback event.

As a subscriber, you are shown 80% less display advertising when reading our articles.

Those ads you do see are predominantly from local businesses promoting local services.

These adverts enable local businesses to get in front of their target audience – the local community.

It is important that we continue to promote these adverts as our local businesses need as much support as possible during these challenging times.